澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网

Killer Bees

Killer Bees

Investopedia / Joules Garcia

What Are Killer Bees?

Killer bees are companies or individualssuch as investment bankers, accountants, attorneys, and tax specialiststhat help target firms avoid being taken over by an unwanted suitor. Their job is to devise and implement 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:anti-takeover defꦺense stra🐼tegies, which generally consist of making the target less attractive or more difficult or costly to acquire.

Key Takeaways

  • Killer bees are companies or individuals that help target firms avoid being taken over.
  • Their job is to devise anti-takeover defense strategies that make the target more difficult or costly to acquire.
  • Killer bees rose to prominence during the 1980s when corporate America came under attack from opportunistic investors known as raiders.
  • The strategies killer bees employ are often controversial, frequently questioned by shareholders, and risk being overturned by the courts.

Understanding Killer Bees

When a company targets another one for acquisition, it will usually first approach its 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:board of directors. If rebuffed, the acquirer could then return with a better bid, walk away, or seek to bypass management by initiating a 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:tender offer directly to shareholders.

Should takeover advances turn unfriendly or hostile, killer bees may be brought on board. Their job is 💞to come💜 up with feasible ways to make life uncomfortable for the prospective buyer, similar to how their namesake stings its victims when provoked until they back off and go away.

Killer bees rose to prominence during the 1980s hostile takeover craze. Back then, a category of investors with deep pockets, known as raiders, began buying 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:undervalued companies and then controversially dismembering them to bag a quick profit. Corporate America wasn't used to this type of behavior and enlisted the help of specialists to defend against these attacks.

Killer bees would present a series of options to the target's board based on its individual circumstances and the characteristics of the company seeking to buy it. To foil a hostile takeover attempt, they generally aim to make the prey either too expensive to acquire or so unattractive that the predator lose꧋s🧸 interest.

Killer Bees Methods

Following the 1980s, defensive measures known as 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:shark repellents were devised to discourage unfriendly takeover attempts. Popular strategies that killer bees use include:

Litigation, such as 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:standstill agreements, might also be used to delay any takeover.

Criticism of Killer Bees

Many of the anti-takeover defense strategies that killer bees utilize don't sit well with shareholders. Making the target less attractive or more expensive to buy generally has a habit of eroding 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:shareholder value and potentially crippling the company for years to come.

The drastic nature of some of these measures, and the frequent inability of regular shareholders to vote on them, has led their legality to ♏be questioned. Not all hostile bidders plan to make a quick buck and ruin companies and, in some cases, being taken over by one of them could be more beneficial from a financial standpoint for existing investors.

Important

The strate🍷gies killer bees employ are often controversial and not always favorable to shareholders, prompting the courts to occasionally intervene.

Limitations of Killer Bees

Over the years, these observations have led the courts to occasionally block companies from employing anti-takeover measures, if they are deemed to be unreasonable. The prospect of intervention from higher powers inevitably means that it is now much harder for killer bees to deliver on their mandates.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Investor.gov. “.”

  2. Lipton, Martin. “.” American Bar Association, vol. 60, no 4, August 2005, pp. 1371.

  3. Shah, Chirag. “.” Western Michigan University, 1996, pp. 13-22.

  4. Rock, Edward. “.” Cardozo Law Review, vol. 23, no. 02-05, 2002, pp. 700.

  5. Lipton, Martin. “.” American Bar Association, vol. 60, no 4, August 2005, pp. 1370-1373.

  6. Harvard Law School Forum꧅ on Corporate Govern🐷ance. “.”

Related Articles